Managing Intellectual Property named Beijing East IP Ltd. as a Tier 3 Patent Prosecution agency in China in 2012.
Beijing East IP Ltd. has won the prize for various years.

In April 2013, Beijing First Intermediate Court rendered the (2013) Yi Zhong Zhi Xin Chu Zi No. 134 Administrative Decision (Decision No. 134) sustained the decision of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board’s (TRAB), where the English mark of a worldwide famous website as well-known in China. Beijing East IP Law Firm represented this worldwide famous website.

On April 24, 2013, Shunde Court announced TOP 10 IP Cases (2008-2012) handled by Shunde Court from 2008 to 2012. The TOP 10 IP cases are selected from over 1,400 IP cases handled by Shende Court in the past five years (from 2008 to 2012), including the IKEA trademark case.

On April 10, 2013, together with commissioner Lipu TIAN, our chairman Dr. GAO, as the very first commissioner for establishing the cooperating relationship between SIPO and the John Marshall Law School at Chicago, was invited to give a speech in 20 Years of Successful Cooperation China-US Seminar on Intellectual Property.

On April 9, 2013, Beijing East IP Ltd. received a favorable decision from Asian Domain Name Dispute Resolution Center (ADNDRC) Hong Kong office, which dismissed all the claims in a complaint filed by East IP Inc., an entity domiciled in Cayman Islands, British West Indies.

India’s Minster for Commerce and Industry Anand Sharma today deposited his country’s instrument of accession to the Madrid Protocol for the International Registration of Marks at WIPO, bringing the total number of members of the international trademark system to 90.

The trademark infringement and unfair competition case for a worldwide famous portal and Internet search engine is selected as a candidate of the TOP 10 IP Cases handled by Guangdong Courts in 2012. The 26 candidates include 6 cases involving foreign parties including Apple (the iPad trademark case), Louis Vuitton (Trademark and unfair competition case), and Sony (Patent case).

Less than 2 percent of technology agreements result in formal dispute proceedings which are generally costly and time-consuming, said a survey issued by World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Thursday.